ON THE EQUALITY OF PAY-OFF MATRICESGORDESCH J.1972; METRIKA; DTSCH.; DA. 1972; VOL. 19; NO 2-3; PP. 140-149; ABS. ALLEM. FR.; BIBL. 9 REF.Serial Issue

A PARTITIONING OF THE POWER IN THE ONE SAMPLE STUDENT T-TESTBROWNE RH; OWEN DW.1978; COMMUNIC. STATIST., SIMUL. COMPUT.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 6; PP. 605-617; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

AN ANALYSIS OF THE TYPE I ERROR IN THE ONE SAMPLE STUDENT T-TESTBROWNE RH; OWEN DB; FAMING JU et al.1978; COMMUNIC. STATIST., SIMUL. COMPUT.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 7; NO 6; PP. 593-603; BIBL. 1 REF.Article

DAS ASYMPTOTISCHE VERHALTEN DES T-TESTS UNDER ALLGEMEINEN ALTERNATIVEN. = LE COMPORTEMENT ASYMPTOTIQUE DU TEST T SOUS DES ALTERNATIVES GENERALESSCHAEFFER M.1975; MATH. OPER.-FORSH. STATIST.; DTSCH.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 5; PP. 775-785; ABS. ANGL. FR.; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

T TESTS AND INTERVALS FOR COMPARISONS SUGGESTED BY THE DATA.DUNCAN DB.1975; BIOMETRICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 339-359; ABS. FR.; BIBL. 1 P.Article

AN ASYMPTOTICALLY EFFICIENT, SEQUENTIAL EQUIVALENT OF THE T-TESTWEISS L; WOLFOWITZ J.1972; J. R. STATIST. SOC., B; G.B.; DA. 1972; VOL. 34; NO 3; PP. 456-460; BIBL. 4 REF.Serial Issue

AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF THE SAMPLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION OF A TRUNCATED SEQUENTIAL T-TESTSUICH R; IGLEWICZ B.1972; J. STATIST. COMPUT. SIMUL.; G.B.; DA. 1972; VOL. 1; NO 3; PP. 247-254; BIBL. 3 REF.Serial Issue

A COMPARISON OF THE INDEPENDENT-SAMPLES T-TEST AND THE PAIRED-SAMPLES T-TEST WHEN THE OBSERVATIONS ARE NONNEGATIVELY CORRELATED PAIRSPOLLAK M; COHEN J.1981; J. STAT. PLANN. INFERENCE; ISSN 0378-3758; NLD; DA. 1981; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 133-146; BIBL. 7 REF.Article

ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE USE OF A TRUNCATED SEQUENTIAL T-TEST.SUICH RC; IGLEWICZ B.1974; J. QUAL. TECHNOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 6; NO 4; PP. 196-206; BIBL. 4 REF.Article

VARIATION DE L'ECART QUADRATIQUE MOYEN ET DE L'ERREUR EN FONCTION DE L'AMPLITUDE DES VARIATIONS ET DU NOMBRE DES EXPERIENCESALYUPOV FG.1972; DOKL. T.S. KH. A.; S.S.S.R.; DA. 1972; NO 174; PP. 162-167Serial Issue

VERGLEICH DES VERALLGEMEINERTEN NICHTZENTRALEN T-TESTS MIT DEM BINOMIALTEST = COMPARAISON DU TEST T NON CENTRE GENERALISE ET DU TEST BINOMIALSTORMER H.1980; METRIKA; ISSN 0026-1335; AUT; DA. 1980; VOL. 27; NO 3; PP. 153-164; ABS. ENG; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

A SIMPLE ALTERNATIVE TO STUDENT'S T.PRESCOTT P.1975; APPL. STATIST.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 24; NO 2; PP. 210-217; BIBL. 11 REF.Article

PERCENTAGE POINTS OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE T STATISTIC WHEN THE PARENT CIS STUDENT'S T.YUEN KK; MURTHY VK.1974; TECHNOMETRICS; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 16; NO 4; PP. 495-497; BIBL. 9 REF.Article

IS THE T TEST REALLY CONSERVATIVE WHEN THE PARENT DISTRIBUTION IS LONG-TAILED.BENJAMINI Y.1983; JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION; ISSN 0162-1459; USA; DA. 1983; VOL. 78; NO 383; PP. 645-654; BIBL. 19 REF.Article

SAMPLE SIZE FORMULAS FOR NORMAL THEORY T TESTSGUENTHER WC.1981; AM. STAT.; ISSN 0003-1305; USA; DA. 1981; VOL. 35; NO 4; PP. 243-244; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

NORMALIZING TRANSFORMATIONS OF STUDENT'S T DISTRIBUTION.PRESCOTT P.1974; BIOMETRIKA; G.B.; DA. 1974; VOL. 61; NO 1; PP. 177-180; BIBL. 8 REF.Article

THE EFFECT OF TRUNCATION ON THE SIZE OF THE T-TEST.SCOTT C; EHSANES SALEH AKM.1975; J. STATIST. COMPUT. SIMUL.; G.B.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 345-368; BIBL. 15 REF.Article

SEQUENTIAL T TESTS BASED ON M ESTIMATORSLIM TK; YUEN FUNG K.1982; J. STAT. COMPUT. SIMUL.; ISSN 0094-9655; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 14; NO 3-4; PP. 271-281; BIBL. 12 REF.Article

EXPECTED SAMPLE SIZE SAVINGS FROM CURTAILED PROCEDURES FOR THE T-TEST AND HOTELLING'S T²HERRMANN N; SZATROWSKI TH.1980; ANN. STATIST.; USA; DA. 1980; VOL. 8; NO 3; PP. 682-686; BIBL. 2 REF.Article

DER STATISTISCHE TEST ALS ENTSCHEIDUNGSHILFE. = LE TEST STATISTIQUE COMME AIDE A LA DECISIONWALTER HF.1976; DEFAZET; DTSCH.; DA. 1976; VOL. 30; NO 1; PP. 21-25Article

THE ROBUSTNESS OF THE ONE-SAMPLE T-TEST OVER THE PEARSON SYSTEMPOSTEN HO.1979; J. STATIST. COMPUT. SIMUL.; GBR; DA. 1979; VOL. 9; NO 2; PP. 133-149; BIBL. 3 REF.Article

ROBUSTNESS OF THE TWO-SAMPLE T-TEST UNDER VIOLATIONS OF THE HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE ASSUMPTIONPOSTEN HO; HON CHENG YEH; OWEN OB et al.1982; COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS. THEORY AND METHODS; ISSN 0361-0926; USA; DA. 1982; VOL. 11; NO 2; PP. 109-126; BIBL. 6 REF.Article

T IS FOR TROUBLE (AND TEXTBOOKS): A CRITIQUE OF SOME EXAMPLES OF THE PAIRED-SAMPLES T-TESTPREECE DA.1982; STATISTICIAN; ISSN 0039-0526; GBR; DA. 1982; VOL. 31; NO 2; PP. 169-195; BIBL. 2 P.Article

MODIFIED T TESTS AND CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR ASYMMETRICAL POPULATIONSJOHNSON NJ.1978; J. AMER. STATIST. ASS.; USA; DA. 1978; VOL. 73; NO 363; PP. 536-544; BIBL. 31 REF.Article

LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANCE OF SOME TWO-SAMPLE TESTS WHEN OBSERVATIONS ARE FROM COMPOUND NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS.LEE AFS; D'AGOSTINO RB.1976; COMMUNIC. STATIST., THEORY METHODS; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 5; NO 4; PP. 325-342; BIBL. 1 P.Article